Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Exploring Varicella Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Rural and Pastoral Children of Qinghai Province: A Cross-Sectional Catch-Up Vaccination Study

Received: 2 July 2024     Accepted: 20 August 2024     Published: 27 August 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Varicella is a respiratory infectious disease caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection. Varicella vaccine has been shown to be highly effective in preventing varicella disease, however it is not included in Qinghai Province’s local immunization planning program and must be paid for by families. Its use in local areas is options instead of compulsory, so high coverage is difficult to guarantee. Starting in October 2021, one dose of live attenuated varicella vaccine was recommended at lest for 3-17-year-old children in Qinghai. In 2022, it was conducted that an investigation of varicella vaccine coverage and factors influencing coverage among children in rural rural and pastoral areas to determine the impact of this VarV catch-up policy. Objective: To explore varicella vaccine coverage and factors influencing caverage among 3-17-year-old children in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was used to select children aged 3-17 years from kindergartens and primary /secondary schools in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province for a questionnaire-based survey of their guardians. Coverage levels of one and two doses of VarV (VarV1 and VarV2) before and after a catch-up vaccination activity initiated in October 2021, and identified factors influenceing VarV1 coverage. Results: VarV1 and VarV2 coverage levels after the catch-up activity were 79.06% (676/855) and 43.79% (363/829), respectively, and increased by 34.38 and 24.13 percentage points compared with before the catch-up activity. Multivariate logistic regression showed that VarV1 coverage was higher in rural areas than in pastoral areas (OR=4.63, 95%CI: 2.91-7.39), and higher among children whose guardians scored 4-6 or 7-10 points on knowledge about varicella and VarV than among children whose guardians scored 0-3 points (OR=8.61, 95%CI: 4.73-15.69, OR=2.86, 95%CI: 1.69-4.84). the main reasons for non-vaccination were guardians’ lack of understanding of VarV (48.6%, 87 children), guardians’ unawarness of the need for VarV vaccination (43.6%, 78 children), and unavailability of VarV at vaccination centers (31.3%, 56 children). Conclusions: The catch-up activity significantly increased VarV coverage among children in the surveyed areas. It should been strengthened that health education on knowledge about varicella and VarV among guardians of children in Qinghai, especially in pastoral areas, to promote VarV vaccination of age-eligible children.

Published in World Journal of Public Health (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15
Page(s) 271-277
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Varicella Vaccine, Coverage, Influencing Factor, Rural and Pastoral Areas, Children

1. Introduction
Vaccinaion, caused by the varicella-zoster virus, is an acute respiratory infectious disease. It has an incubation period of 10-21 days, with the most common being 14-16 days . Waterpox outbreaks can occur throughout the year. Infection can result in symptoms such as fever and widespread itchy rash, easily leading to outbreaks in schools and childcare facilities . The primary burden of varicella is economic, as there are high number of cases, and parents and caregivers need to spend time caring for sick children. Case without complications often last for up to 2 weeks , during which time children are unable to attend daycare or school.
Vaccination with the Varicella vaccine (VarV) is the most effective measure for preventing chichenpox and its complications . Although VarV has been widely used since 1974 , there are significant differences in public health policies regarding varicella immunization worldwide. Some countries have included varicella vaccine in their national immunization programs . However, in China, VarV is a classified as a Category II vaccine, which means it is voluntary and self-paid, making it challenging to achieve high vaccination coverage.
To better protect the health of children in Qinghai Province, the Qinghai Provincial Health Commission, Qinghai Provincial Department of Education, and Qinghai Provincial Department of Finance jointly issued a document in October 2021, recommending that each city and prefecture would autonomously organize the catch-up varicella vaccination for school-aged students. It is recommended that children up to 12 years old receive one dose, and children aged 13 and above receive two doses. Therefore, this study was conducted in the rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province in 2022 to investigate the VarV vaccination rate among children and its influencing factors, aiming to provide reference for improving the VarV immunization strategy for children in our province. We report the findings of this investigation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Sources
A standardized questionnaire was used for data collection, filled out by guardians of the children through the “Wenjuanxing” platform. The survey included demographic information of the children, VarV immunization history, and the guardians’ knowledge about chickenpox and VarV. The VarV immunization history information was based on the children's immunization records, and there were a total of 10 questions on chichenpox and VarV knowledge, with 1 point awarded for each correct answer and no points for wrong or unknown answers.
2.2. Study Subjects and Sampling Methods
Preschool and junior high school children were selected as the study subjects. The sample size was calculated using the formula for calculating sample size in cross-sectional surveys, n=[Z2P(1-P)/d2]Deff, with an expected VarV vaccination rate P=50%, significance level α=0.05 (Z=1.96), allowable error d=5%, design effect Deff=2, the calculated sample size was 768 cases. Considering a 10% loss to follow-up rate, the sample size was expanded to 845 cases. Stratified cluster sampling was used to select three counties in the rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province. One kindergarten, one primary school, and one junior high school were sampled in each county. The study included children in the kindergarden class, third grade of primary school, and eighth grade of junior high school (excluding those with a history of chichenpox).
2.3. Vaccination
VarV is not included in the immunization schedule of Qinghai Province and is administered on a voluntary, self-paid basis. Starting from October 2021, catch-up vaccination of VarV for primary and secondary school students has been implemented in Qinghai Province. Students aged ≤12 years who have not received VarV vaccination in the past, have no contraindications to VarV vaccination, and have no confirmed history of chickenpox are recommended to receive one dose. Students aged ≥13 years are recommended to receive two doses. The vaccine expenses are coordinated by the financial departments at all levels, with both self-paid and free vaccination options are available in the province.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Microsoft Excel 2016和SPSS19.0 software were used for data organization and statistical analysis. The vaccination rates of the first and second doses of VarV (VarV1 and VarV2) among children surveyed before and after the implementation of the catch-up vaccination policy were calculated. Factor influencing the VarV1 vaccination rate were analyzed using the chi-square test, and variables with significance were included in the multivariable logistic regression model for multivariable analysis.
2.5. Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Qinghai Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Approval No.2022004). Informed consent was obtained from the guardians of the children before the survey.
3. Results
3.1. Basic Characteristics of the Surveyed Subjects
A total of 926 questionnaires were collected, excluding 71 children with a history of chickenpox, resulting in 855 children (92.33%) included in the analysis. Among them, 466 (54.50%) were from rural areas and 389 (45.50%) were from pastoral areas. The study population comprised 438 (51.23%) males and 417 (48.77%) females. The average age of the children was 9.04±3.85 years (range: 3-17years). In terms of guardianship, the surveyed children were mainly cared for by mothers 516 (60.35%), followed by fathers 247 (28.89%), and other guardians 92 (10.76%).
3.2. VarV Vaccination Rate
After the catch-up vaccination, the vaccination rate of VarV1 for children aged 3-17 in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province was 79.06%, which increased by 34.38 percentage points compared to before the catch-up. The increase was 34.77 percentage points in rural areas and 33.94 percentage points in pastoral areas (χ2=13.99, P<0.001). The increase was 34.93 percentage points for males and 33.81 percentage points for females (χ2=0.007, P=0.935). Among different age groups, the vaccination coverage for children aged 3-7, 8-12, and 13-17 increased by 32.89, 21.65, and 50.19 percentage point respectively (χ2=53.53, P<0.001). (Table 1)
After the catch-up vaccination, the vaccination rate of VarV2 for children aged 3-17 in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province was 43.79%, an increase of 24.13 percentage points compared to before the catch-up vaccination. Specifically, the increase was 25.22 percentage points for children in rural areas and 22.82 percentage points in pastoral areas (χ2=54.42, P<0.001). Moreover, the increase was 24.41 percentage points for males and 23.83 percentage points for females (χ2=1.91, P=0.38). Among different age groups, the vaccination coverage for children aged 3-7, 8-12, and 13-17 increased by 20.07, 17.55 and 36.08 percentage point respectively (χ2=32.90, P<0.001).
Table 1. Vaccination rate of VarV among children aged 3-17 in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province before and after the catch-up in 2022.

variables

Eligible

Pre-catch-up vaccination

Post-catch-up vaccination

VarV1

VarV2

VarV1

VarV2

VarV1

VarV2

Vaccinated

Rate (%)

Vaccinated

Rate (%)

Rate (%)

Vacci- nated

Vacci-nated

Rate (%)

Region

Rural area

466

452

264

56.65

128

28.32

426

91.42

242

53.54

Pastoral area

389

377

118

30.33

35

9.28

250

64.27

121

32.10

Gender

Males

438

422

200

45.66

91

21.56

353

80.59

194

45.97

Females

417

407

182

43.65

72

17.69

323

77.46

169

41.52

Aged (year)

3-7

301

289

135

44.85

70

24.22

234

77.74

128

44.29

8-12

291

285

166

57.04

59

20.70

229

78.69

109

38.25

13-17

263

255

81

30.80

34

13.33

213

80.99

126

49.41

Total

855

829

382

44.68

163

19.66

676

79.06

363

43.79

3.3. Reasons of VarV Non-Vaccination
Among the 179 children who did not receive VarV vaccination, the main reasons for non-vaccination were guardians’lack of understanding of VarV (48.6%, 87 children), guardians’ unawarness of the need for VarV vaccination (43.6%, 78 children), and unavailability of VarV at vaccination centers (31.3%, 56 children).
3.4. Factors Influencing VarV1 Vaccination
Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in VarV1 vaccination rates among the surveyed children in different regions, with varying education levels of mothers, different numbers of children in the household, and different scores on guardians’ knowledge of chickenpox and VarV. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the region and guardians’knowledge of chickenpox and VarV were factors influencing the VarV1 vaccination rate among the surveyed children. Specifically, children in rural areas had a higher vaccination rate compared to those in pastoral areas (OR=4.63, 95%CI: 2.91-7.39). Additionally, children with knowledge scores of 4-6 and 7-9 on chickenpox and VarV demonstrated higher vaccination rates compared to those with scores of 0-3 (OR=8.61, 95%CI: 4.73-15.69, OR=2.86, 95%CI: 1.69-4.84). (Table 2)
Table 2. Factors infuluencing the VarV1 vaccination rate among children aged 3-17 in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province in 2022.

Variables

Surveyed

Vaccinated

Rate (%)

Single-factor analysis

Multivariable analysis

χ2

Р

OR

95%CI

Regions

Rural area

466

426

91.42

94.41

0.001

4.63

2.91-7.39

Pastoral area

389

250

64.27

1.00

Gender

Males

438

353

80.59

1.27

0.260

Females

417

323

77.46

Aged (year)

3-7

301

234

77.74

0.93

0.628

8-12

291

229

78.69

13-17

263

213

80.99

Father’s education level

Below junior high school

326

258

79.14

2.19

0.533

High/vocational school

120

93

77.50

College associate degree

103

86

83.50

Bachelor’s degree or higher

217

179

82.49

Unknown

89

60

67.42

Mother’s education level

Below junior high school

316

234

74.05

11.25

0.010

High/vocational school

114

94

82.46

Associate degree

94

82

87.23

Bachelor’s degree or higher

241

199

82.57

Unknown

90

67

74.44

Number of children in the faminly

1

212

169

79.72

14.94

0.001

2

471

389

82.59

3

172

118

68.60

Average monthly income per capita of the family

<3000 yuan

390

296

75.90

4.40

0.111

3000-4999 yuan

252

207

82.14

≥5000 yuan

213

173

81.22

Surveyed guardian’s perception of vaccine prices

Expensive

337

283

83.98

35.423

0.001

Suitable

248

212

85.48

Cheap/Does’t matter

46

33

71.74

Unclear

224

148

66.07

Surveyed guardian’s knowledge scores on chickenpox and VarV

0-3

164

83

50.61

121.23

0.001

1.00

4-6

304

236

77.63

8.61

4.73-15.69

7-10

387

357

92.25

2.86

1.69-4.84

4. Discussion
Varicella is a highly contagious global epidemic disease that can lead to a significant socioeconomic burden. Vaccination with VarV is the most effective measure to prevent varicella and its complications. In recent years, the incidence of varicella in Qinghai Province has been increasing, with the highest rate reaching 72.0/100,000. Increasing the vaccination rate of VarV among children can effectively control the varicella epidemic and create herd immunity in the population. This study showed that in 2022, the VarV1 and VarV2 vaccination rates among children aged 3-17 in some rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province were 79.06% and 43.79%, respectively. These rates were higher than the national VarV1 and VarV2 vaccination rates among children aged 1-14 (52.72% and 11.43%) , but lower than the reported rates in Shanghai Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, and Beijing. WHO recommends that if varicella vaccine is used, coverage should be maintained at 85% to 90% to most effectively protect individes, achieve herd imunity, and avoid increasing the incidence of varicella in order individuals, who tend to have more severe cases. Some studies show that outbreaks can still occur even with ≥90% one-dose coverage If the vaccination rate remains below 80% for an extended period, although the total number of varicella cases may decrease, there may be a shift in the age of onset for varicella, resulting in an increased incidence in older age groups.
Qinghai Province implemented a catch-up vaccination policy for VarV among primary and secondary school students in October 2021. Currently, VarV is not part of the national immunization program, and the funding for VarV vaccinationg among children is managed though local-level financial coordination. In some areas, the costs of vaccine administration are covered by local-level financing, while in others, they are borne by parents. The results of this study demonstrate a signigicant increase in the VarV1 and VarV2 vaccination rates among children in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province following the implementation of the catch-up vaccination policy. The vaccination rates increased by 34 and 24 percentage points, respectively, compared to before the policy implementation. The increase in the vaccination rate was higher in rural areas than in pastoral areas, and the proportion of children receiving self-paid vaccination was significantly higher in rural areas. The unequal distribution of VarV vaccination rates among children in rural and pastoral areas is primarily influenced by local economic levels. The study also identified a significant increase in the VarV vaccination rate among children aged 13-17 following the implementation of the catch-up vaccinaton policy, possibly due to differences in catch-up immunization strategies for VarV, or it might be linked to heightened parental awareness prompted by frequent campus outbreak. These findings underscore the importance of policy guidance for VarV vaccination among children and recommend adherence to the 2-dose VarV immunization schedule to improve vaccination rates, improve vaccine efficacy, and reduce breakthrough varicella cases . It is worth noting that administering two doses not only provides better protection than a single dose but also significantly lowers the incidence of varicella compared to a one-dose schedule .
The study revealed that the VarV vaccination rate among children in rural areas was significantly higher than that among children in pastoral areas, and it increased with increased knowledge levels of guardians regarding varicella and VarV. However, family income, number of children in the household, and vaccine prices were not factors influencing the VarV vaccination rate among children. This may be attributed to the implementation of the catch-up vaccination policy, which requires guardians to have their children vaccinated with VarV. Most guardians are willing to self-pay for VarV vaccination to protect their children’s health. Lack of knowledge about VarV among guardians, unawareness of the need for VarV vaccination for children, and unavailability of VarV at vaccination centers were the primary reasons for children not receiving VarV vaccination. Therefore, it is feasible to explore the inclusion of VarV in the provincial immunization program based on the needs of varicella control. Further efforts are needed to strenthen the promotion and education of guadians’ knowledge regarding varicella and VarV vaccination in vulnerable areas. This can be achieved through collaborative efforts among disease prevention and control departments, education departments, and other stakeholders to promote voluntary self-paid VarV vaccination among parents. Additionally, adjustments to prevention and vaccination service delivery models in rural and pastoral areas, as well as ensuring the availability of VarV in vaccination centers, will improve the accessibility of preventive vaccination services.
A major limitation of this study is that the survey was conducted among children selected from kindergartens and primary and secondary schools in the county where the study was conducted, which may lead to an overestimation of the VarV vaccination rate among children.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the implementation of the catch-up vaccination policy in Qinghai Province has contributed to the improvement of VarV vaccination rates among children and has encouraged voluntary and self-paid vaccination among parents to protect their children’s health.
Abbreviations

VZV

Varicella-Zoster Virus

VarV

Varicella Vaccine

Author Contributions
Guan Bingju: Data curation, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing, Visualization
Hao Zengping: Resources, Data curation
Ba Wengsheng: Conceptuazation, Data, Formal analysis, Methodology
Zhu Xianglu: Inrestigation, Data curation, Visualization
Ma Yanmei: Investigation, Curation
Li Lianwei: Methodology
Xie Qingyu: Resources
A Kezhong: Methodology, Writing-review & editing, Project adninistration
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the outcome of this research work has been reported in this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
There is no conflict of interest of the authors in this study.
References
[1] Heininger, U., Seward, J. F. Varicella. Lancet 2006, 368, 1365–1376.
[2] Ren Hong, Li Lanjuan Infectious Diseases [M] Version 8 Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2013: 69-71.
[3] ZHU YF, LI YF, DU Y, ZENG M. Epidemiological characteristics of breakthrough varicella infection during varicella outbreaks in Shanghai, 2008–2014. Epidemiology and Infection. 2017, 145(10): 2129-2136.
[4] Peng Qingqin, Xie Xu, Wu Taishun, Wu Xiaoliang, Xia Tianlong, Tang Guangxin. Investigation and analysis of a varicella outbreak in a school in Shenzhen. Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2022. 38(07): 692-695.
[5] Wang Cuiling, Huang Lili, Chen Xiaohong, Huang Enmiao. Characteristics of varicella outbreaks and the effectiveness of varicella vaccine in Zhongshan City from 2013 to 2018. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2019. 25(06): 635-638.
[6] Zhang ZJ, et al. Systematic review and evidence quality analysis of the effectiveness of a single dose varicella vaccine in protecting healthy children aged 1-12 years in China. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2020. 41(7): 1138-1144.
[7] Takahashi M., Otsuka T., Okuno Y., Asano Y., Yazaki T. Live vaccine used to prevent the spread of varicella in children in hospital. Lancet. 1974, 2: 1288–1290.
[8] Seward J. F., Watson B. M., Peterson C. L., Mascola L., Pelosi J. W., Zhang J. X., Maupin T. J., Goldman G. S., Tabony L. J., Brodovicz K. G., et al. Varicella disease after introduction of varicella vaccine in the United States, 1995–2000. JAMA. 2002, 287: 606–611.
[9] Choi W. S., Noh J. Y., Huh J. Y., Jo Y. M., Lee J., Song J. Y., Kim W. J., Cheong H. J. Seroprevalence of varicella-zoster virus in Korea. J. Med. Virol. 2010, 82: 2123–2126.
[10] Zhu Y., Zhu J., Cao Y., Lu F. Protective efficacy of varicella attenuated live vaccine for children in China: A Meta-analysis. Chin. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 18: 587–592.
[11] Zhang Huayi, Wang Weijun, Li Deen, Shi Yan, Xu Lili, Cao Hailan, Li Yonghong. Epidemiological analysis of varicella in Qinghai Province from 2014 to 2016. Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2018. 34(05): 452-454.
[12] Zhao Jinhua, Long Jiang, Zhao Jianhai, Xu Lili, Ma Binzhong, Cao Hailan. Analysis of the characteristics and spatiotemporal dynamics of varicella in Qinghai Province from 2010 to 2020. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2022. 49(15): 2700-2703.
[13] Hu Qianqian, Zhang Qian, Li Yuanqiu, Zheng Hui, Liu Qianqian, Tang Lin, Wang Xiaoqi, Yang Hong, Wen Ning, Yin Zundong, Wang Fuzhen. Varicella vaccine coverage among 1-14 year-old children in China in 2020. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization 2022. 28(02): 169-173+178.
[14] Tian Meng, Wang Weiwei, Yao Hongcen, Wang Jingjing, Zhou Jie. Analysis of varicella vaccine coverage among 1-12 year-old children in Jinshan District, Shanghai. Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 2020. 31(5): 53-56.
[15] Xu Yuyang, Liu Yan, Zhang Xiaoping, Du Jian, Che Xinren, Wang Jun, Gu Wenwen, Zhang Xuechao, Jiang Wei. Investigation of varicella vaccine coverage among 2-11 year-old children in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. Preventive Medicine, 2020. 32(07): 689-691+697.
[16] Zhao Dan, Suo Luodan, Lu Li, Pan Jingbin, Ji Wenyan, Liu Weixiang, Yao Wei. Varicella vaccine coverage before and after the recommended 2-dose immunization program in Beijing, 2007-2017. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2019. 25(2): 198-202.
[17] WHO. Varicella and herpes zoster vaccines: WHO position paper, June 2014. Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire, 2014. 89(25).
[18] Lopez AS, Guris D, Zimmerman L, Gladden L, et al. One dose of varicella vaccine does not prevent school outbreaks: is it time for a second dose? Pediatrics. 2006 Jun, 117(6): e1070-7.
[19] Jiye Fu, Juguang Wang, Chu Jiang, et al. Outbreak of varicella in highly vaccinated preschool population. Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Aug: 37: 14-8.
[20] Fang Xueqiang, Jia Xiucai, Liu Xiaodong, Xiong Ping, Xu Qing, Xu Aiqiang. Epidemiological characteristics of varicella in Shandong Province during different immunization strategies periods. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2021. 27(6): 6 67-672.
[21] Yosuke Yasui, Toshikatsu Mitsui, Fujiyo Arima, et al. Changes in epidemiological characteristics and sero-prevalence against the varicella zoster virus in school-age children after the introduction of a national immunization program in Japan. Hum Vaccin Immunothe. 2021 Aug 3, 17(8): 2494-2500.
[22] Huimin Chen, Chumin Liang, Xiaorong Huang, et al. Vaccination against Varicella Zoster Virus Infection in Less Developed Regions of Guangdong, China: A Cross-Sectional Serosurveillance Study. Vaccines. 2023 Feb 21, 11(3): 494.
[23] Xin Zhaohua, Zhang Yushu, Wang Meng, et al. Investigating parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding chickenpox and varicella vaccination among children aged 0-12 in Pudong New Area, Shanghai [J]. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 023, 06): 80-686.
[24] Liu Li, Tang Fenyang, Wang Zhiguo, Yu Jing, Zhang Lei, Hu Ran, Gao Jun, Kang Guodong. Evaluation of varicella vaccination coverage among preschool-aged children in Jiangsu Province in 2021. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2022. 28(03): 346-349.
[25] Pan Xingqiang, Ma Rui, Fang Ting, Dong Hongjun, Xu Guozhang. Impact of implementing a 2-dose varicella vaccine immunization strategy on the incidence of varicella. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2018. 24(04): 434-436.
[26] Ning Guijun, Yin Dapeng. WHO position paper on varicella and herpes zoster vaccines (June 2014). Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2014. 20(06): 562-567.
[27] Citation: Liu, X., Li, Q., et al. Vaccine Coverage andEffectiveness in a School-BasedVaricel la Outbreak in Jinan Prefecture, Shandong Province. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1225.
[28] American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases. Prevention of varicella: recommendations for use of varicella vaccines in children, including a recommendation for a routine 2-dose varicella immunization schedule. Pediatrics. 2007 Jul, 120(1): 221-31.
[29] Lopez, A. S., Guris, D., et al. One dose of varicella vaccine does not prevent school outbreaks: Is it time for a second dose? Pediatrics 2006, 117, e1070-9.
[30] Gao, Z., Gidding, H. F., Wood, J. G., et al. Modelling the impact of one-dose vs. two-dose vaccination regimens on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus in Australia. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 457–468.
[31] WHO. Varicella and Herpes Zoster Vaccines: WHO Position Paper, June 2014 --Recommendations, Vaccine. 2016 Jan 4, 34(2): 198-199.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Bingju, G., Zengping, H., Wengsheng, B., Xianglu, Z., Yanmei, M., et al. (2024). Exploring Varicella Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Rural and Pastoral Children of Qinghai Province: A Cross-Sectional Catch-Up Vaccination Study. World Journal of Public Health, 9(3), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Bingju, G.; Zengping, H.; Wengsheng, B.; Xianglu, Z.; Yanmei, M., et al. Exploring Varicella Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Rural and Pastoral Children of Qinghai Province: A Cross-Sectional Catch-Up Vaccination Study. World J. Public Health 2024, 9(3), 271-277. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Bingju G, Zengping H, Wengsheng B, Xianglu Z, Yanmei M, et al. Exploring Varicella Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Rural and Pastoral Children of Qinghai Province: A Cross-Sectional Catch-Up Vaccination Study. World J Public Health. 2024;9(3):271-277. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15,
      author = {Guan Bingju and Hao Zengping and Ba Wengsheng and Zhu Xianglu and Ma Yanmei and Li Lianwei and Xie Qingyu and A Kezhong},
      title = {Exploring Varicella Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Rural and Pastoral Children of Qinghai Province: A Cross-Sectional Catch-Up Vaccination Study
    },
      journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {271-277},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20240903.15},
      abstract = {Background: Varicella is a respiratory infectious disease caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection. Varicella vaccine has been shown to be highly effective in preventing varicella disease, however it is not included in Qinghai Province’s local immunization planning program and must be paid for by families. Its use in local areas is options instead of compulsory, so high coverage is difficult to guarantee. Starting in October 2021, one dose of live attenuated varicella vaccine was recommended at lest for 3-17-year-old children in Qinghai. In 2022, it was conducted that an investigation of varicella vaccine coverage and factors influencing coverage among children in rural rural and pastoral areas to determine the impact of this VarV catch-up policy. Objective:  To explore varicella vaccine coverage and factors influencing caverage among 3-17-year-old children in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was used to select children aged 3-17 years from kindergartens and primary /secondary schools in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province for a questionnaire-based survey of their guardians. Coverage levels of one and two doses of VarV (VarV1 and VarV2) before and after a catch-up vaccination activity initiated in October 2021, and identified factors influenceing VarV1 coverage. Results: VarV1 and VarV2 coverage levels after the catch-up activity were 79.06% (676/855) and 43.79% (363/829), respectively, and increased by 34.38 and 24.13 percentage points compared with before the catch-up activity. Multivariate logistic regression showed that VarV1 coverage was higher in rural areas than in pastoral areas (OR=4.63, 95%CI: 2.91-7.39), and higher among children whose guardians scored 4-6 or 7-10 points on knowledge about varicella and VarV than among children whose guardians scored 0-3 points (OR=8.61, 95%CI: 4.73-15.69, OR=2.86, 95%CI: 1.69-4.84). the main reasons for non-vaccination were guardians’ lack of understanding of VarV (48.6%, 87 children), guardians’ unawarness of the need for VarV vaccination (43.6%, 78 children), and unavailability of VarV at vaccination centers (31.3%, 56 children). Conclusions: The catch-up activity significantly increased VarV coverage among children in the surveyed areas. It should been strengthened that health education on knowledge about varicella and VarV among guardians of children in Qinghai, especially in pastoral areas, to promote VarV vaccination of age-eligible children.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Exploring Varicella Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Rural and Pastoral Children of Qinghai Province: A Cross-Sectional Catch-Up Vaccination Study
    
    AU  - Guan Bingju
    AU  - Hao Zengping
    AU  - Ba Wengsheng
    AU  - Zhu Xianglu
    AU  - Ma Yanmei
    AU  - Li Lianwei
    AU  - Xie Qingyu
    AU  - A Kezhong
    Y1  - 2024/08/27
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15
    T2  - World Journal of Public Health
    JF  - World Journal of Public Health
    JO  - World Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 271
    EP  - 277
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-6059
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240903.15
    AB  - Background: Varicella is a respiratory infectious disease caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection. Varicella vaccine has been shown to be highly effective in preventing varicella disease, however it is not included in Qinghai Province’s local immunization planning program and must be paid for by families. Its use in local areas is options instead of compulsory, so high coverage is difficult to guarantee. Starting in October 2021, one dose of live attenuated varicella vaccine was recommended at lest for 3-17-year-old children in Qinghai. In 2022, it was conducted that an investigation of varicella vaccine coverage and factors influencing coverage among children in rural rural and pastoral areas to determine the impact of this VarV catch-up policy. Objective:  To explore varicella vaccine coverage and factors influencing caverage among 3-17-year-old children in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was used to select children aged 3-17 years from kindergartens and primary /secondary schools in rural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province for a questionnaire-based survey of their guardians. Coverage levels of one and two doses of VarV (VarV1 and VarV2) before and after a catch-up vaccination activity initiated in October 2021, and identified factors influenceing VarV1 coverage. Results: VarV1 and VarV2 coverage levels after the catch-up activity were 79.06% (676/855) and 43.79% (363/829), respectively, and increased by 34.38 and 24.13 percentage points compared with before the catch-up activity. Multivariate logistic regression showed that VarV1 coverage was higher in rural areas than in pastoral areas (OR=4.63, 95%CI: 2.91-7.39), and higher among children whose guardians scored 4-6 or 7-10 points on knowledge about varicella and VarV than among children whose guardians scored 0-3 points (OR=8.61, 95%CI: 4.73-15.69, OR=2.86, 95%CI: 1.69-4.84). the main reasons for non-vaccination were guardians’ lack of understanding of VarV (48.6%, 87 children), guardians’ unawarness of the need for VarV vaccination (43.6%, 78 children), and unavailability of VarV at vaccination centers (31.3%, 56 children). Conclusions: The catch-up activity significantly increased VarV coverage among children in the surveyed areas. It should been strengthened that health education on knowledge about varicella and VarV among guardians of children in Qinghai, especially in pastoral areas, to promote VarV vaccination of age-eligible children.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusions
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • Data Availability Statement
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information