D. H. Lawrence has always been a controversial writer in literary area when it comes to the modernity, for he was active in the transitional era between realism and modernism. But it is almost accepted that he is more of a modernist writer. When talking about the way he demonstrates his sharp resistance against industrial civilization, the resolution he offers to recover the loss of humanity in his novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover, we cannot bypass the perspectives of symbolism, imagery and metaphors which have been widely discussed by the academic field. Different from other contemporary writers, Lawrence emphasizes the depiction of interactions between human beings and non-human materials, and gives an exquisite description on various spaces in this novel. As a result, this paper intends to analyze the characterization and Lawrence’s vision of modernity from the perspective of New Materialism, focusing on the writing of non-human things, especially the interaction/intra-action between people and things in different spaces, in order to prove how the space changes and how the characters’ interactions with things actively influence or even determine the hero and heroine’s choices, and further result in their alienation and emancipation respectively. By employing the theory of Spatial narrative and thing theory, this paper is going to make it be more plausible that D. H. Lawrence is a great modernist and holds a critical view on industrial civilization, and call for more attention and studies on how non-human things influence and mould human beings and how the plot and theme of novel are driven by the interactions between people and things.
Published in | International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16 |
Page(s) | 110-118 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
D. H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’s Lover, New Materialism, Non-human Things, Spatial Narrative
[1] | Auden, W. H. “SOME NOTES ON D. H-LAWRENCE”. Nation, vol. 164, no. 17, Apr. 1947, 482–483. |
[2] | An, Dongyang, "Brief Analysis of the Spatial Narration of the Novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover". Times Literature, 05 (2015): 76. |
[3] | Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Critical Inquiry. 2001, 1-22. |
[4] | Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Trans. Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press, 1994. |
[5] | Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: a Political Ecology of Things. London: Duke University Press, 2010. |
[6] | Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Signs. 2003, 801-831. |
[7] | Gifford, Terry. “Flowers as ‘Other’, Then ‘Other’, in The White Peacock and Lady Chatterley’s Lover.” The Journal of D. H. Lawrence Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, 2014, 71–85. |
[8] | Heidegger, Martin. Poetry, language, thought. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. New York: HarperCollins, 2001. |
[9] | Humma, John. B. “The Interpenetrating Metaphor: Nature and Myth in Lady Chatterley’s Lover”. Modern Language Association. 1983, 77-86. |
[10] | Jackson, Dennis. “LADY CHATTERLEY’S COLOR”, Interpretations. 1983, 29-52. |
[11] | Lawrence, D. H., Lady Chatterley’s Lover, 1sted, Shanghai, World Publishing Corporation, 2009. |
[12] | Liu Qiping, “People and things”. Orbis Litter. 2020; 00: 1–15. |
[13] | Moynahan, Julian. “Lady Chatterley’s Lover: The Deed of Life”. ELH. 1959, 66-90. |
[14] | Mitchell, W. J. T. “Romanticism and the Life of Things: Fossils, Totems, and Images.” A Material Culture Reader. Ed. Meng Yue and Luo Gang. Beijing: Peking UP, 2008: 530-46. |
[15] | Schwarzmann, Georg M. “Marxism and Bolshevism in D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover”. South Atlantic Modern Language Association. 2008, 81-95. |
[16] | Stanek, Łukasz. Henri Lefebvre On Space, Architecture, Urban Research, and the Production of Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011. |
[17] | Squires, Michael. “Pastoral Patterns and Pastoral Variants in Lady Chatterley’s Lover”. ELH. 1972, 129-146. |
[18] | Trotter, David. “Techno-Primitivism: Á Propos of Lady Chatterley’s Lover.” Modernism/Modernity, vol. 18, no. 1, Jan. 2011, 149–166. |
[19] | Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. New York: Oxford University Press, 1975. |
[20] | Lawrence, D. H., Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Nanjing, Yilin Press, translated by Heima, 2014. |
[21] | Zhou, Jie. “Recent D. H. L awrence Study Home and Abroad”. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, (05) 2004: 109-112. |
[22] | Han, Qiqun. "A Study of Bill Brown’s New Materialism in Literary Criticism". Foreign Literature, (06) 2019: 104-114. |
[23] | Han, Qiqun. "The Material Turn: A Keyword in Critical Theory". Foreign Literature, (06) 2017: 88-99. |
[24] | Long, Diyong. Space Narratology. 2008. Shanghai Normal University, PhD dissertation. |
[25] | The Material Culture Studies: A Reader, edited by Meng Yue, Luo Gang. Beijing, Peking University Press, 2008.1: 530-46. |
[26] | Zhang, Qiong. Study on the Space of Mining Countryside in D. H. Lawrence’s Novels. 2014. Central China Normal University, PhD dissertation. |
APA Style
Yu Jiahui. (2022). The Interaction/Intra-action of People and Things in Different Spaces in Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 10(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16
ACS Style
Yu Jiahui. The Interaction/Intra-action of People and Things in Different Spaces in Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2022, 10(2), 110-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16
AMA Style
Yu Jiahui. The Interaction/Intra-action of People and Things in Different Spaces in Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Int J Lit Arts. 2022;10(2):110-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16, author = {Yu Jiahui}, title = {The Interaction/Intra-action of People and Things in Different Spaces in Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover}, journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {110-118}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20221002.16}, abstract = {D. H. Lawrence has always been a controversial writer in literary area when it comes to the modernity, for he was active in the transitional era between realism and modernism. But it is almost accepted that he is more of a modernist writer. When talking about the way he demonstrates his sharp resistance against industrial civilization, the resolution he offers to recover the loss of humanity in his novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover, we cannot bypass the perspectives of symbolism, imagery and metaphors which have been widely discussed by the academic field. Different from other contemporary writers, Lawrence emphasizes the depiction of interactions between human beings and non-human materials, and gives an exquisite description on various spaces in this novel. As a result, this paper intends to analyze the characterization and Lawrence’s vision of modernity from the perspective of New Materialism, focusing on the writing of non-human things, especially the interaction/intra-action between people and things in different spaces, in order to prove how the space changes and how the characters’ interactions with things actively influence or even determine the hero and heroine’s choices, and further result in their alienation and emancipation respectively. By employing the theory of Spatial narrative and thing theory, this paper is going to make it be more plausible that D. H. Lawrence is a great modernist and holds a critical view on industrial civilization, and call for more attention and studies on how non-human things influence and mould human beings and how the plot and theme of novel are driven by the interactions between people and things.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Interaction/Intra-action of People and Things in Different Spaces in Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover AU - Yu Jiahui Y1 - 2022/03/31 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 110 EP - 118 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221002.16 AB - D. H. Lawrence has always been a controversial writer in literary area when it comes to the modernity, for he was active in the transitional era between realism and modernism. But it is almost accepted that he is more of a modernist writer. When talking about the way he demonstrates his sharp resistance against industrial civilization, the resolution he offers to recover the loss of humanity in his novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover, we cannot bypass the perspectives of symbolism, imagery and metaphors which have been widely discussed by the academic field. Different from other contemporary writers, Lawrence emphasizes the depiction of interactions between human beings and non-human materials, and gives an exquisite description on various spaces in this novel. As a result, this paper intends to analyze the characterization and Lawrence’s vision of modernity from the perspective of New Materialism, focusing on the writing of non-human things, especially the interaction/intra-action between people and things in different spaces, in order to prove how the space changes and how the characters’ interactions with things actively influence or even determine the hero and heroine’s choices, and further result in their alienation and emancipation respectively. By employing the theory of Spatial narrative and thing theory, this paper is going to make it be more plausible that D. H. Lawrence is a great modernist and holds a critical view on industrial civilization, and call for more attention and studies on how non-human things influence and mould human beings and how the plot and theme of novel are driven by the interactions between people and things. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -