Maize is among the most important cereal crops in Ethiopia. Rely-intercropping of mung bean between maize enable to get grain yield of maize instead sole alone. Field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of relay intercropping mung bean at different population density and row arrangements with maize yield components and yield of the component crops, to evaluate the productivity and economic value of maize-mung bean intercropping at Sankura Wereda Jejebicho research station in 2019-2021 main cropping season. Three spatial row arrangements (1:1, 1:2 and 1:3) with four population densities (PD) (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) were intercropped with maize variety ‘Shone’. Each of the component crops were included as a sole for comparison. Randomized complete block design in factorial with three replications was used. days to tasselling, days to physiological maturity, leaf area, leaf area index, hundred kernel weight, grain yield and harvest index of maize significantly affected by the interaction effects of population density and spatial arrangements of mung bean. The highest (8.19 ton/ha) grain yield of maize was obtained from 100% population density and 1:3 spatial row arrangement of mung bean. This may due to the presence of high interspecific competition with related high plant population density per plot area compared to other treatments. Whereas the highest grain yield mung bean (18.54 Quintal/ha) was obtained from when mung rely intercropped with 100% population density and 1:3 row arrangements. The highest thousand seed weight (42.18g) was recorded from 25% population density and 1:1 row arrangements of mung bean. The maximum Land equivalent ration value was calculated from 1.88 from 100% population density in 2019 cropping season. The highest monitory advantage index value 110,280 Ethiopian birr) was obtained from 100% population density with all the three spatial row arrangement of mung bean. Therefore, this experiment could be recommended for mung bean rely cropped with maize by 100% population density and 1:3 row arrangement able the famers to get better grain yield of maize as well as mung bean.
Published in | Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18 |
Page(s) | 54-66 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Grain Yield, Mung Bean, Population Density, Row Arrangements
[1] | Abuhay Takele and Jibril Mohammed. 2016. Time of Haricot Bean Intercropping into the Maize Based Cropping Systems under Conservation Tillage in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia, Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science, 26 (2): 11-26. |
[2] | Akanda, M. E. and Quayyam M. A. 1982. Effect of intercropping soybean, cowpea, mungbean, blackgram and groundnut with maize. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 7 (2): 66-69. |
[3] | Akhtaruzzaman, M. A. 1987. Effect of planting system and nitrogen levels on grain yield of maize intercropped with mungbean. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Dept. of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. |
[4] | Alemayehu D., Shumi D. and Afeta T. 2018. Effect of Variety and Time of Intercropping of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) With Maize (Zea mays L.) on Yield Components and Yields of Associated Crops and Productivity of the System at Mid-Land of Guji, Southern Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 6: 324. doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000324. |
[5] | Asim M., Aslam, M, Hashmi, NI, Kisana, NS. 2006. Mungbean (Vigna radiata) in wheat based cropping system: An option for resource conservation under rainfed ecosystem. Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology; 37 (4): 1197-1204. |
[6] | Azim Muhammad Khan, Khalid Naveed, Kawsar Ali, Bashir Ahmad and Samin Jan. 2012. Impact of mung bean-maize intercropping on growth and yield of mungbean Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 18 (2): 191-200. |
[7] | Bechem Eneke E., Ojong Agbor N. and Etchu Kingsley A. (2018). the effects of intercropping and plant densities on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max) in the humid forest zone of Mount Cameroon African Journal of Agricultural Research 13 (12); 574-587. |
[8] | EPP (Ethiopian Pulses Profile), "Ethiopian Export Promotion Agency, Product development and market research directorate, May 2004 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," 2004. |
[9] | Khan, M. A., K. Ali, Z. Hussain, and R. A. Afridi. 2012. Impact of maize-legume intercropping on weeds and maize crop. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 18 (1): 127-136. |
[10] | MoANR (Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources) (2016). Nutrition sensitive Agriculture Draft Strategic Plan Addis Ababa: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. |
[11] | Mogotsi, K. K., 2006. Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. In: Brink, M. & Belay, G. (Editors). PROTA 1: Cereals and pulses/Céréales et légumes secs. [CD-Rom]. PROTA, Wageningen, Netherlands. |
[12] | Paul, B. K., Frelat, R., Birnholz, C., Ebong, C., Gahigi, A., Groot, J. C. J., Herrero, M., Kagabo, D. M., Notenbaert, A., Vanlauwe, B., van Wijk, M. T., 2018. Agricultural intensification scenarios, household food availability and greenhouse gas emissions in Rwanda: Ex-ante impacts and trade-offs. Agric. Syst. 163, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.007. |
[13] | Polhill, R. M. and V, L. J. G. 1985. "Taxonomy of grain legumes," Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 21-27. |
[14] | Puranik S, Jha S, Srivastava PS, Sreenivasulu N, Prasad M. 2011. Comparative tran- scriptome analysis of contrasting foxtail millet cultivars in response to short-term salinity stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 168: 280–287 DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.07.005. |
[15] | Teame Gereziher, Ephrem Seid, Lemma Diriba and Getachew Bisrat. 2017. Adaptation study of Mung bean (vigna radiate L.) Varieties in Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia. |
[16] | Evans J., A. Mcneill M., Unkovich M. J. Fettell N. A. and Heenan. D. P. 2001. Net nitrogen balances for cool-season grain legume intercropping and contributions to wheat nitrogen uptake: a review of Australia Journal Experiment on Agriculture. 41: 347-359. |
[17] | ECX (Ethiopian Commodity Exchange), "Ethiopian commodity exchange rings bell for Mung Bean, January 23, 2014 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," 2014. |
[18] | Kalra, G. S. and Gangwar B. 1980. Economics of intercropping of different legume with maize at different levels of nitrogen under rainfedconditions. Indian J. Agron. 25 (2): 181-185. |
[19] | Kumar, R. B. P., Ravi S. and Balyan J. S. 2008. Effect of maize (Zea mays) + black gram intercropping and integrated nitrogen management on productivity and economics of maize. International Journal of Plant Science. 3 (1): 53-57. |
[20] | Olijaca S., Vetkovic D., Vasic G., and Momirovic N. 2000. Effect of plant arrangement pattern and irrigation onefficiency of maize (Zea mays) and bean (Phaseolusvulgaris) intercropping system, ournal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 135, 261–270. |
[21] | Singh, B., Narang, M. P., 1992. A comparison of chemical composition, cell-wall content, digestibility and degradation kinetic characteristics as predictors of forage intake. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 62: 369-373. |
[22] | Thailand Office of Agricultural Economics. 2010. Agricultural economic database. [Online]. Available from: http://www.oae.go.th/download/download_journal/yearbook2552.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2018]. |
[23] | Ibedo, A. S. 2014. Analysis of the green gram value chain in Uganda. MSc. Thesis. Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 113pp. Retrieved from http://dspace.mak.ac.ug/handle/10570/3242 |
[24] | Islam, M. N., M. M. Haque and A. Hamid. 2006. Planting arrangement and population density effects on the physiological attributes and productivity of maize–bush bean intercropping systems. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 31 (3): 353-364. |
[25] | Ghosh, P. K., Bandyopadhyay K. K., Wanjari R. H., Manna M. Misra K. C. A., Mohanty M. and Rao A. S. 2007. Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use-efficiency in major cropping systems - an Indian perspective: a review. J. Sust. Agri. 30 (1): 59-86. |
[26] | Li, L., C. Tang, Z. Rengel and F. S. Zhang. 2003. Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source. J. Plant Soil. 248: 297-303. |
[27] | Nazir, M. S., A. Jabbar, I. Ahmad, S. Nawaz and I. H. Bhatti. 2002. Production potential andeconomics of intercropping in autumnplanted sugarcane. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4 (1): 140-142. |
[28] | Rosaiah, G., Kumari D. S., Satyanarayana A., Rajarajeswari V. Naidu N. V. and Singh U. 1993. Cooking quality and nutritional characters of mungbean (Vigna radiata. L.) will czek Varities. J. Food Sci. Tech. 30 (3): 219-221. |
[29] | Swaminathan R., Meena BM, Meena A. K and Kumar A. 2012. Intercropping of mung bean with maize for better grain yield production Agricultural research sciences journals 3; 123-129. |
[30] | Tsubo, M., Walker S. and Mukhala E. 2003. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Res. 71: 17-29. |
[31] | Willey, R. W. 1979. Intercropping: its performance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abs. 32: 1-10. |
[32] | Wondimkun Dikr and Nibret Tadesse. 2021. Intercropping of Newly Released Common Bean Varieties with Maize at Jejebicho Research Station in Sankura Wereda Silte Zone of Southern Ethiopia International Journal of Agriculture and Bioscience 10 (3): 170-179. |
[33] | Zhang, L., W. Werf, S. Zhang, B. Li and J. H. J. Spiertz. 2007. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Res. 103: 178-188. |
APA Style
Wondimkun Dikr. (2022). Relay Cropping Mung Bean by Plant Density and Row Arrangements with Maize on Yield and Yield Components of Component Crops at Jejebicho, Southern Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 11(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18
ACS Style
Wondimkun Dikr. Relay Cropping Mung Bean by Plant Density and Row Arrangements with Maize on Yield and Yield Components of Component Crops at Jejebicho, Southern Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2022, 11(1), 54-66. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18
AMA Style
Wondimkun Dikr. Relay Cropping Mung Bean by Plant Density and Row Arrangements with Maize on Yield and Yield Components of Component Crops at Jejebicho, Southern Ethiopia. Agric For Fish. 2022;11(1):54-66. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18
@article{10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18, author = {Wondimkun Dikr}, title = {Relay Cropping Mung Bean by Plant Density and Row Arrangements with Maize on Yield and Yield Components of Component Crops at Jejebicho, Southern Ethiopia}, journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {54-66}, doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20221101.18}, abstract = {Maize is among the most important cereal crops in Ethiopia. Rely-intercropping of mung bean between maize enable to get grain yield of maize instead sole alone. Field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of relay intercropping mung bean at different population density and row arrangements with maize yield components and yield of the component crops, to evaluate the productivity and economic value of maize-mung bean intercropping at Sankura Wereda Jejebicho research station in 2019-2021 main cropping season. Three spatial row arrangements (1:1, 1:2 and 1:3) with four population densities (PD) (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) were intercropped with maize variety ‘Shone’. Each of the component crops were included as a sole for comparison. Randomized complete block design in factorial with three replications was used. days to tasselling, days to physiological maturity, leaf area, leaf area index, hundred kernel weight, grain yield and harvest index of maize significantly affected by the interaction effects of population density and spatial arrangements of mung bean. The highest (8.19 ton/ha) grain yield of maize was obtained from 100% population density and 1:3 spatial row arrangement of mung bean. This may due to the presence of high interspecific competition with related high plant population density per plot area compared to other treatments. Whereas the highest grain yield mung bean (18.54 Quintal/ha) was obtained from when mung rely intercropped with 100% population density and 1:3 row arrangements. The highest thousand seed weight (42.18g) was recorded from 25% population density and 1:1 row arrangements of mung bean. The maximum Land equivalent ration value was calculated from 1.88 from 100% population density in 2019 cropping season. The highest monitory advantage index value 110,280 Ethiopian birr) was obtained from 100% population density with all the three spatial row arrangement of mung bean. Therefore, this experiment could be recommended for mung bean rely cropped with maize by 100% population density and 1:3 row arrangement able the famers to get better grain yield of maize as well as mung bean.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Relay Cropping Mung Bean by Plant Density and Row Arrangements with Maize on Yield and Yield Components of Component Crops at Jejebicho, Southern Ethiopia AU - Wondimkun Dikr Y1 - 2022/02/16 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18 DO - 10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18 T2 - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JF - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JO - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries SP - 54 EP - 66 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5648 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20221101.18 AB - Maize is among the most important cereal crops in Ethiopia. Rely-intercropping of mung bean between maize enable to get grain yield of maize instead sole alone. Field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of relay intercropping mung bean at different population density and row arrangements with maize yield components and yield of the component crops, to evaluate the productivity and economic value of maize-mung bean intercropping at Sankura Wereda Jejebicho research station in 2019-2021 main cropping season. Three spatial row arrangements (1:1, 1:2 and 1:3) with four population densities (PD) (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) were intercropped with maize variety ‘Shone’. Each of the component crops were included as a sole for comparison. Randomized complete block design in factorial with three replications was used. days to tasselling, days to physiological maturity, leaf area, leaf area index, hundred kernel weight, grain yield and harvest index of maize significantly affected by the interaction effects of population density and spatial arrangements of mung bean. The highest (8.19 ton/ha) grain yield of maize was obtained from 100% population density and 1:3 spatial row arrangement of mung bean. This may due to the presence of high interspecific competition with related high plant population density per plot area compared to other treatments. Whereas the highest grain yield mung bean (18.54 Quintal/ha) was obtained from when mung rely intercropped with 100% population density and 1:3 row arrangements. The highest thousand seed weight (42.18g) was recorded from 25% population density and 1:1 row arrangements of mung bean. The maximum Land equivalent ration value was calculated from 1.88 from 100% population density in 2019 cropping season. The highest monitory advantage index value 110,280 Ethiopian birr) was obtained from 100% population density with all the three spatial row arrangement of mung bean. Therefore, this experiment could be recommended for mung bean rely cropped with maize by 100% population density and 1:3 row arrangement able the famers to get better grain yield of maize as well as mung bean. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -